Did you know a huge legal showdown is brewing? The WASPI campaign is heading to the High Court in December, pushing for DWP compensation after years of battling state pension changes. Will their decade-long fight finally see a breakthrough? Get the full story and see what’s next for thousands of women!
A significant legal confrontation is on the horizon as the Women Against State Pension Inequality (WASPI) campaign prepares to challenge the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) in a crucial judicial review, seeking redress for state pension age changes.
The High Court is set to host this pivotal two-day hearing on December 9 and 10, a date confirmed by the WASPI Campaign to its dedicated supporters. Should their case prevail, the campaign anticipates a ruling that deems the government’s current reasons for refusing DWP compensation as irrational, thereby compelling a re-evaluation of their position.
This long-standing dispute centers on the dramatic increase in the State Pension Age for women born in the 1950s, which rose from 60 to 65, and subsequently to 66. Campaigners argue that these Pension Reform changes were inadequately communicated by the DWP, leaving hundreds of thousands of women unprepared for significant financial hardship.
Towards the end of last year, the government explicitly declared its firm decision to provide no compensation to the affected women. This announcement, delivered by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall before Parliament, asserted that the majority of women were already aware of the impending changes and that earlier notification efforts would have had minimal impact.
Undeterred by the government’s unwavering stance, the WASPI Campaign swiftly pursued a Judicial Review UK of this decision, leading to the High Court examination overseen by Judge Jonathan Swift. This legal challenge represents a direct counter to the DWP’s justification for withholding financial recompense.
In the run-up to the court hearing, the DWP is mandated to furnish WASPI’s legal team with extensive documentation designed to bolster the government’s defence, articulating why the refusal of compensation is deemed appropriate and legally sound. This exchange of detailed grounds of resistance is a critical phase in the litigation process for Women’s Rights UK.
The WASPI campaign has highlighted the substantial task ahead for its legal experts, who are meticulously scrutinizing potentially thousands of pages of material. To support these efforts, a robust fundraising drive has already amassed over £240,000, nearing its ambitious £270,000 target to cover escalating legal costs.
Beyond the courtroom, the WASPI movement garners significant political backing, with numerous individual Members of Parliament expressing solidarity for the cause. Prominent political parties, including the Liberal Democrats and the Scottish National Party (SNP), have also publicly endorsed the call for compensation for the women impacted by the state pension age adjustments.