Ever wondered what happens when two of AFL’s biggest online personalities clash? Dan Gorringe and Dylan Buckley’s bitter rivalry is spilling into the public eye, with one demanding an apology after feeling ‘shafted’. This isn’t just friendly banter anymore – what really went wrong between these footy influencers?
The Australian Rules Football (AFL) social media landscape has been rocked by a burgeoning public feud between two of its most prominent online personalities, Dan Gorringe and Dylan Buckley. What initially appeared to be a playful on-field skirmish during a recent Legends match has since been confirmed as a deep-seated professional and personal rift, revealing the intense competitive undercurrents within the influencer sphere.
The tension between Gorringe, a former Gold Coast and Carlton player, and Buckley, a fellow podcaster, reportedly stems from past business ventures. Both individuals cultivated a significant following through their collaborative efforts, particularly with their podcast “List Cloggers,” which garnered a dedicated fan base eager for insights into the world of Australian Rules Football.
Gorringe has openly expressed feeling “shafted” by his former business partner, articulating a strong desire for an apology and a demonstration of respect for his contributions to their shared endeavors. His public statements indicate that the fallout extends beyond mere professional disagreement, touching upon issues of trust and acknowledgment within their past partnership.
The public spotlight on their strained relationship intensified during a Legends match at Marvel Stadium in Melbourne. While many spectators initially perceived the early-game scuffle between Gorringe, representing the All Stars, and Buckley, playing for Victoria, as light-hearted banter, Gorringe later clarified that the animosity was genuine and reflective of their ongoing dispute.
Since parting ways in 2023, both Gorringe and Buckley have continued to cultivate their individual online presences and podcasts. Gorringe has particularly flourished, transforming into a significant online sensation with a rapidly growing audience. This independent success has inadvertently fueled their rivalry, positioning them as direct competitors in the lucrative Australian Rules Football content creation market.
Despite the public friction, Buckley has maintained a more conciliatory tone regarding their separation, stating last year that he wished Gorringe “nothing but the best.” He attributed their decision to go separate ways primarily to timing, suggesting a less contentious perspective on the business split, although Gorringe’s recent comments contradict this narrative.
The continuing public discussion surrounding their conflict highlights the significant influence both men wield within the Australian Rules Football community. With substantial social media followings, particularly on platforms like Instagram, their content shapes discussions and engages thousands of dedicated footy fans, underscoring their critical role as contemporary sports commentators and personalities.
The ongoing demand from Gorringe for an apology underscores a deeper issue concerning professional ethics and personal accountability within the fast-evolving world of sports media. This public dispute serves as a compelling case study on how personal dynamics can intersect with professional aspirations in the highly visible realm of digital content creation.
