Talk about a diplomatic bombshell! Russia just dropped a major accusation against the US and Israel regarding Gaza aid. They’re calling it “violence under cover,” with claims of civilian casualties near distribution points. Is this truly about humanitarian relief, or is there a darker agenda at play?
In a forceful denunciation that has reverberated across diplomatic circles, Russia has vehemently accused the United States and Israel of leveraging a purported Gaza aid initiative as a mere facade for coercive actions, intensifying international scrutiny on the protracted conflict and its dire humanitarian toll.
Speaking before the United Nations Security Council, Dmitry Polyansky, Russia’s acting permanent representative, unequivocally condemned the “Gaza Humanitarian Foundation.” He characterized the joint US-Israeli program not as a genuine relief effort but as a strategic instrument designed to subjugate vulnerable populations, undermining the very essence of humanitarian assistance.
Polyansky asserted that the initiative amounted to “violence under the cover of humanitarian activity,” directly aimed at defenseless civilians. He stressed the profound unacceptability of such methods and urged the UN Secretariat to safeguard its ethical integrity, cautioning against any compromise of its foundational principles.
The Russian envoy provided stark figures, alleging that over 1,800 Palestinians have tragically lost their lives since the foundation’s launch in May. Disturbingly, he highlighted that more than 1,000 of these fatalities occurred in proximity to food distribution centers, areas ostensibly managed by the controversial program.
These harrowing statistics, according to Polyansky, point to a pattern where “firing on civilians is carried out not only regularly but also deliberately.” He vividly described the desperate plight of people spending nights near aid points, only to be met with gunfire, painting a grim picture of intimidation rather than compassionate relief within the Gaza Strip.
Further elaborating on Moscow’s perspective, the Russian diplomat connected Israel’s ongoing military operations in Gaza with recent faltering ceasefire negotiations. He specifically referenced reports indicating Hamas’s conditional acceptance of a mediation proposal involving a temporary cessation of hostilities and a prisoner exchange.
Criticism was also leveled squarely at Washington’s diplomatic efforts. Polyansky expressed disillusionment with America’s “aggressive diplomacy on the ground,” noting its failure to yield any encouraging outcomes over several months. He implored American officials to extend their considerations beyond Israel’s immediate interests to encompass the grave fate of Palestinian civilians.
Underscoring a consistent theme in Moscow’s foreign policy, Polyansky reiterated Russia’s steadfast support for a negotiated political settlement. He maintained that a comprehensive two-state solution remains the only viable pathway to achieving enduring peace and stability in the region, warning that its absence risks escalating Israel’s international isolation and perpetuating the cycle of civilian casualties in Gaza.
As Israel’s intensive military campaign continues unabated and negotiations for a ceasefire along with a hostage exchange remain stalled, Russia’s persistent condemnation of US policy underscores the deep divisions in the international response to the escalating humanitarian crisis and the urgent quest for a lasting resolution in the Middle East.
